The Scientific Evidence


Scientific Evidence

 

The scientific evidence below has been drawn from various publications and is available in the public domain.

 

Physiology & Behavior, Vol. 63. No. 2, pp. 249-252, 1998©1998 Elsevier Science Inc.

 

Binaural Auditory Beats Affect Vigilance Performance and Mood

James D. Lane*, Stefan J. Kasiamn*, Justine E. Owens** And Gail R. Marsh*

 

*Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and **Center for the Study of Complementary and Alternative Therapies, School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia

 

Received 18 July 1997; Accepted 29 August 1997

Lane, J. D., S. J. Kasian, J. E. Owens And G. R. Marsh.  Binaural auditory beats affect vigilance performance and mood.  PHYSIOL BEHAV 63 (2) 249 252, 1998. – When two tones of slightly different frequency are presented separately to the left and right ears the listener perceives a single tone that varies in amplitude at a frequency equal to the frequency difference between the two tones, a perceptual phenomenon known as the binaural auditory beat.  Anecdotal reports suggest that binaural auditory beats within the electroencephalograph frequency range can entrain EEG activity and may affect states of consciousness, although few scientific studies have been published.  This study compared the effects of binaural auditory beats in the EEG beta and EEG theta/delta frequency ranges on mood and on performance of a vigilance task to investigate their effects on subjective and objective measures of arousal.  Participants (n = 29) performed a 30-min visual vigilance task on three different days while listening to pink noise containing simple tones or binaural beats either in the beta range (16 and 24 Hz) or the theta/delta range (1.5 and 4 Hz).  However, participants were kept blind to the presence of binaural beats to control expectation effects.  Presentation of beta-frequency binaural beats yielded more correct target detections and fewer false alarms than presentation of theta/delta frequency binaural beats.  In addition, the beta-frequency beats were associated with less negative mood.  Results suggest that the presentation of binaural auditory beats can affect psychomotor performance and mood.  This technology may have applications for the control of attention and arousal and the enhancement of human performance.  ©1998 Elsevier Science Inc.

 

Keywords:  binaural auditory beats, vigilance performance, mood, frequency-following response.

 


Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 11. No. 3, pp. 263-274, 1997
0892-3310/97© 1997
Society for Scientific Exploration.

 

Accessing Anomalous States of Consciousness with a Binaural Beat Technology

 

The Monroe Institute, 62 Roberts Mountain Road, Faber, VA 22938-2317

 

Abstract – Exposure to binaural beats in an environment of restricted stimulation coupled with a guidance process can safely provide access to and experiences in many propitious states of consciousness.  This method requires a unique combination of well-understood psycho-physiological inductive techniques with the addition of a refined binaural-beat technology.  Binaural beats provide potential consciousness-altering information to the brain’s reticular activating system.  The reticular activating system in turn interprets and reacts to this information by stimulating the thalamus and cortex thereby altering arousal states, attentional focus, and the level of awareness, i.e., the elements of consciousness itself.  This effective binaural-beat process offers a wide variety of beneficial applications and vehicle for the exploration of expanded states of consciousness.

 

Keywords: consciousness – altered states

 

Binaural-Beat Induced Theta EEG Activity and Hypnotic Susceptibility

D. Brian Brady

Northern Arizona University

May 1997

 


ABSTRACT

 

Six participants varying in degree of hypnotisability (two lows, two mediums and two highs) were exposed to three sessions of a binaural-beat sound stimulation protocol designed to enhance theta brainwave activity.  The Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C (SHSS: C) was used for pre and post-stimulus measures of hypnotic susceptibility.  Time-series analysis was used to evaluate anterior theta activity in response to binaural-beat sound stimulation over baseline and stimulus sessions.  A protocol designed to increase anterior theta activity resulted in a significant increase in theta measures (% activity) between pre-stimulus baseline and stimulus observations for five of six participants.  Hypnotic susceptibility levels remained stable in the high-susceptible group, and increased moderately in the low and medium susceptible groups.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Differential individual response to hypnosis, has, captured the attention of hypnosis practitioners and researchers since the time of Mesmer, in the late 18th century.  Despite the long recognized importance of individual variation in hypnotisability, efforts to modify or increase individual hypnotic susceptibility have proven to be problematic and controversial.

 

Part of the difficulty in addressing the nature of hypnotisability has been the lack of consensus regarding the basic phenomena of hypnosis.  The central issue has been whether observed hypnotic responses are due to an altered state of consciousness or merely the product of psychosocial factors. 

 

Considering hypnosis as either an altered state or as a purely psychosocial phenomenon served to provide two opposing factions into which most theories of hypnosis could be grouped.  Contemporary hypnosis researchers tend to hold less extreme positions, realizing the benefit of a perspective, which is comprised of the strengths of both the special-process (i.e., altered state of consciousness) and the social-psychological theoretical domains.

 

Theoretical Perspectives of Hypnosis

The 1960’s witnessed the advent of standardized hypnotic susceptibility measurements.  Reliable standardized instruments have been developed for use with groups and individuals.  Early work with the electroencephalogram (EEG) designed to identify hypnotic susceptibility also began around this time.  More recent EEG/hypnosis research has focused on electro cortical correlates of both the state of, and differential individual response to, hypnosis.  The concept of a reliable electro cortical correlate of hypnotic susceptibility draws attention to the recent applications of neurofeedback therapy, which has employed a number of protocols designed for individual brainwave modification.  Recent advances in the application of binaural-beat technology and the associated EEG frequency following response, which can be either relaxing or stimulating, have demonstrated efficacy of brainwave modification in areas such as enriched learning, improved sleep, and relaxation (Atwater, 1997).  In consideration of recent EEG / hypnosis research along with the recently demonstrated efficacy of EEG neurofeedback training research and the binaural-beat technology applications, it would seem that the lingering question of hypnotisability modification can now be addressed by utilizing brainwave modification within a systematic protocol.

 

As mentioned earlier, it has often been the case in the past to view the field of hypnosis as being dominated, theoretically, by two opposing camps; the special-process and the social-psychological.  In general, the special-process view holds that hypnosis induces a unique state of consciousness; whereas, the social-psychological view maintains that hypnosis is not a distinct physiological state.

 

Popular authors of the post-Mesmeric period (i.e., mid 19th century), such as James Braid, proposed psycho physiological and sometimes neurophysiological explanations for the hypnotic phenomenon (Sabourin, 1982).  In fact, Braid adopted the term ‘neuro-hypnology’ to describe the phenomenon and is credited as the originator of the term ‘hypnosis’ (Bates, 1994, p.24).  The work of other English physicians, such as John Elliotson and James Esdaile, on surgical anesthesia and clinical pain relief in the mid-19th century (Soskis, 1986), are indicative of the psycho physiological zeitgeist of hypnosis in that time.  This physiologically oriented perspective is reflected in Hilgard’s neodissociation model (Hilgard, 1986), which suggests that hypnosis involves the activation of hierarchically arranged subsystems of cognitive control.  This dissociation of consciousness is clearly manifested in the realm of hypnotically induced analgesia.  Hilgard’s conception of a ‘hidden observer’ (Hilgard, 1973) as a dissociated part of consciousness, a part that is always aware of non-experienced pain and can be communicative with the therapist, is exemplified in his description of a hypnotically analgesic individual whose hand and arm were immersed in circulating ice water as follows:

 

All the while that she was insisting verbally that she felt no pain in hypnotic analgesia, the dissociated part of herself was reporting through automatic writing that she felt the pain just as in the normal non-hypnotic state (p. 398).